Commissioners Respond to Alternate Proposals for Firmenich Property
Officials from the Richman Group presented two additional site proposals at a workshop Monday night, but commissioners still expressed reservations about the whole project.
Safety Harbor residents packed City Hall to hear the latest developments in the ongoing Firmenich property issue Monday night.
Representatives of the Richman Group of Florida unveiled two new plans for the property that addressed previous issues raised by the commission and the community, including reducing the building heights from four stories to three and the number of units from 296 to 276.
But instead of approving any of the three proposals put forth by the developer, new concerns as well as previous perceived drawbacks left the project in limbo.
“I’m having a hard time with the ingress and egress, number one, and I’m having a real hard time with the commercial use,” Mayor Andy Steingold said, referring to the proposed entrance to the property on State Road 590 and the 37,900 square feet of commercial development that would be part of the deal.
“I’d feel more comfortable if we could get another ingress/egress on McMullen Booth.”
The other commissioners expressed their concerns as well.
“In the past I said I’d like to see a 30 percent reduction, which is somewhere around 198-200 (units),” Commissioner Cliff Merz said. “I personally think the density is still too high at 276 (units).”
“Two hundred and seventy-six units is the baseline for us,” Richman Group development associate Damon Kolb said. “The price doesn’t make sense to us at a lower density.”
Commissioner Nina Bandoni said she is less concerned with the number of units than the actual site plan, while Commissioner Nancy Besore likened the whole process to that of buying a car.
“I wanted to compliment you for coming down from four (stories) to three,” she said. “But I hate buying a car, and I feel right now as though I’m buying a car. I feel as though you came to us with the worst deal first ... and I hate that.”
Kolb did say that the company has no plans to use the property for anything other than market rate housing, meaning no subsidized, or Section 8, tenants, and he promised that the commercial development would be limited to lower-scale uses such as banks and offices.
But ultimately, concerns with the overall size and scope of the project seemed to stall the issue in its tracks.
“There’s a lot of angst in the community. This is such a huge change for us,” Besore said.
“I’m not saying it’s a bad project. I think it’s a great concept,” Mayor Steingold said. “I’m just not so sure that the residents of the city of Safety Harbor are ready for that concept.”
We'd like to know your thoughts on the latest developments in this story. Please let us know how you feel about the Firmenich issue in the comments below.
Harborite
7:14 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
The City Commissioners were right to be skeptical of this large scale commercial and apartment project proposed by the Richman Group. This project is too large and it will cause lots of traffic problems for Safety Harbor residents using SR590 and McMullen Booth Rd. Also, bringing in nearly 600 new residents, who are all renters with no stake in the community, would be a big mistake. There would be up to 200 new students attending our school system that we taxpayers would have to educate and bus to school. Safety Harbor should say no to this project. We are an attractive City and I'm sure that a better opportunity will be presented in the near future that will fit in better and will cause less problems for the residents of Safety Harbor.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
8:16 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Harborite, the impression many people took away from the workshop last night is that this deal could be dead. But as Mr. Kolb said, if the Richman Group pulls out, the property could remain vacant for years, or the owners could sell to someone looking to put more industrial or larger commercial ventures on the property. It is an interesting situation. Thanks for the comment.
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
9:41 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I saw that as a veiled threat. It's either us or them...to buy that much property only to be able to build on a small parcel is not feasible. There is 34 acres and only half is buildable. They (Frimenich) would have sold it long ago had it been viable. To pave over the wetland the mitigation permits would again be cost prohibitive.
Harborite
11:08 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Jeff, It is unlikely that an even larger industrial or commercial project would be proposed if the Richman Group's current project were rejected. I believe that as Safety Harbor continues to become a more attractive City, better and more appropriate developments for the Firmenich property will eventually be proposed. The developers are coming to our City and we should be clear that we don't want their developments to devalue our City and it's property values. We need to protect the quality of life that we enjoy here and not allow large scale developments to change our small City way of life.
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
8:24 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Okay Bobby is ringing in. This morning I fired off an e-mail to Commissioner Besore expressing my concerns that go beyond traffic. Mr. Kolb stated that "the company has no plans to use the property for anything other than market rate housing". But what if they can't get it filled and sell. Will the new owner be bound to that concept? My next concern is the land itself, it has been an industrial site forever, what has seeped in or been dumped into the soil? Children play in the dirt, if the dirt is toxic it could be disaster waiting to happen. Mayor Steingold's concerns over the encroachment of commercial building along the McMullen-Booth corridor is right on. A number of years ago I was speaking to County Commissioner Karen Seel, she remembers when McMullen-Booth was a two lane road. The decision to widen and expand was tempered with it never to become the next US19. No one wants to stand in the way of progress. But do we need another nail salon, or gamer’s paradise? Inch by inch foot by foot the developers are chomping at the bit when they see land that is buildable. From Gulf to Bay to Curlew Rd. when will we say enough is enough?
Fritz Kirsch
1:00 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I appreciate the above comment written by Robt. Saltzman. I particularly like the comment regarding the potential re-sale of the apartment complex if the Richmond Group decides to get rid of it after a while. Rentals don't being in the same type of community loyalty that permanent residents bring with them. At this point there may be no plan for Section 8 housing but will that always be the case? We need development that is less intrusive and to people who plan to make Safety Harbor a permanent home.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
9:01 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Excellent points Bobby!
Fritz Kirsch
1:05 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Renters have no permanent loyalty to the community they are temporarily roosting in. They are generally transients who have another destination in mind. Section 8 housing may not be on the books at this time but who's to say this wouldn't be the plan for a later date or with a different corporation owning the property. Permanent residents have a deep connection to their home town. This is the type residents we're looking for to keep the charm of Safety Harbor. I've watched the development of S.H. for 36 years. It's gone relatively well to kee the small town atmosphere. The current proposal to redevelope the old citrus processing plant area doesn't sound like what the residents of Safety Harbor would be pleased with. I'm not, that's for sure.
Valerie Nolte
3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I've had my concerns as well about the future of any rental properties built on this site. Look around it and mostly what you'll see are more warehouses plus a couple of auto repair shops. Personally, if I were a renter looking to pay market rate for an apartment, I'd want something with a much better view.
Dee Dokumaci
8:10 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
All too often many apartment complexes that start out as luxury apartments almost always end up as section 8 or low income housing, most families don't want to waste their money paying rent, houses for sale are still low enough to buy with down payment & lower monthly rates than rent providing you have credit, now if you don't have good credit you will not be able rent in a complex due to credit check so building this humongous complex is not the right move, I feel best use for this property is a country club & golf course, this would complete the charm of our quaint town, just a suggestion look forward to your comments...
DP
12:33 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Dee - timely article in today's (Dec 16) Tribune about developers converting their apt/condo complexes into low income housing in order to become eligible for tax credits. Even if the Richman Group formally agreed not to, if they sold the property, the new buyers would not be under any obligation to keep it at market rates. Suddenly you have 276 low income units. Yes that's a worst case scenario, but that's certainly not what is being sold on these proposals.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
10:09 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I bet there are a lot of people in town who would like to see a golf course there Dee!
David Conkle
11:51 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
How about a disc golf course? Only having 34 acres probably limits the number of holes to nine and even then golf courses use a lot of water and chemicals to keep them maintained, Does anyone know the selling price of this property, maybe the city could buy the property and make it a multi-use park and perserve the land for the use of us citizens, our children and generations to come.
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
5:53 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
. "Does anyone know the selling price of this property"
The price of this property is insignificant. If it were prime it would have been sold a long time ago. The old location, location, location is out the window with this. The wetlands make it cost prohibitive to buy mitigation permits to pave it over make it unpalatable. Get Firmenich to donate it to the city, the city can tear down the buildings and build a boardwalk through the property like John Chestnut Park. Turn it into a nature walk for school trips and just a nice little untouched eco system. Minimum invasion and we have our own little sunken gardens. Aw gee there I go again with all that tree hugging hippie talk. Funny no one from Firmenich is attending the meetings and workshops. Are they embarrassed about taking 100 plus jobs from the city?
David Conkle
11:54 pm on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I meant to say "traditional golf courses use a lot of water and chemicals to keep them maintained." A disc golf course is self substaining and the more trees the better.
David Conkle
7:42 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Hey Bobby, think you meant to use irrelevent instead of insignificant in your missive. And what do you have against tree-hugging hippies?
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
8:23 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Busted by the grammar police... again. Sometimes my brain goes a lot faster than my fingers. I am a Safety Harbor original; when it comes to tree hugging David. Except now the trees love me so much when I walk down the street they hug me!
Jeffrey Rosenfield
7:57 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Sounds like Bobby has done his homework. Almost like he was running for city commission or something... :)
David Conkle
8:52 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
I'm just goofing on you Booby, but, actually wouldn't the anology work better as your fingers go a lot faster than your brain? And does this now make the trees Robert Saltzman hugging hippies? Just sayin... that's all. Love ya man!
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
9:11 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
LOL
David Conkle
8:56 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Sorry, meant to type Bobby. Damn fingers!
Jeffrey Rosenfield
11:09 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
I'm really enjoying this dialog between you two!
Ross "Roscoe" Rayner
7:31 am on Saturday, November 24, 2012
I've lived here 8 years. Small house up aorund the bend from this property. I've enjoyed your thoughts. I like the idea of a preserve. Does the City have the funds available for such a project? I have not read much of the discussion. How great of a tax windfall could this property be for the City? In the end, I'd rather have it sit silent, as is, than see it developed.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
10:08 am on Saturday, November 24, 2012
Roscoe, thank you for the comment and the support of Safety Harbor Patch. As for putting a preserve on the land, I know that the majority of the area is currently zoned for industrial use, and it is owned by the Firmenich company. They are trying to sell it, and the Richman Group is offering to purchase it and have some of the zoning rights changed so they can put a residential development as well as commercial businesses on the property. If the Richman Group deal does not go through, the land could indeed remain undeveloped for a long time. As for the city purchasing the property, that hasn't been discussed as an option yet, and I'm not sure if it would ever happen. I would have to get a city official to comment on that possibility. Thanks again.
Robert "Bobby" Saltzman
11:44 am on Saturday, November 24, 2012
Dec 3rd meeting should be interesting....I would love for someone to bring up the "lets make it a preserve" option ..I don't think it will fly because the City sees this as some kind of Tax windfall. But in the long run it probably will cost more in traffic, schooling, police patrol, etc..but then again I'm just an old tree hugger...