patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City, Developer Agree to Review Firmenich Property Proposal

The issues of traffic flow and building height will be addressed at a City Commission workshop next month, according to officials.

 

Following Monday night's city commission meeting, in which Mayor Andy Steingold and others expressed reservations about the current parameters of the Firmenich property proposal, the city and the developer have agreed to address the concerns at a workshop in the near future, according to officials.

After taking the concerns to the developer, the Richman Group of Florida, City Manager Matt Spoor said they decided to explore how amendments to the current proposal would affect the viability of the deal.

"(The developer) authorized the third party traffic study and have begun exploring how a three story product would change the site layout, future land use plan, building footprint, setbacks, preservation area, etc...," Spoor said via email. 

"(City) Staff suggested (and Richman agreed) scheduling a City Commission Workshop to review and discuss any alternate plan which limits the building height to three stories," he added.

Mayor Steingold admitted Monday night that negative feedback he has been receiving from the community forced him to address the issue now, rather than wait for the next time it was scheduled to go before the commission in November.

He said the main problems as he understood them were with the traffic on SR590, the height of the buildings, which residents would like to see lower than the proposed four-story units, and the number of units in the residential complex, which currently calls for 296 units.

"We’ve got an obligation based upon the sentiments in the community ... to convey any changes we wish to be made to the agreement," Steingold said. "Then they can decide to either agree with the changes or decide not to move forward.”

Community Development Director Matt McLachlan said he had been told on numerous occasions that the developer was firm on the height of the buildings and the number of units.

But after reaching a consensus from the commission on revisiting the building height, Spoor said he would take the information to the developer.

After speaking with representatives of the Richman Group on Tuesday, they came to the agreement to look into the traffic and building height issues and further review the proposal.

"Once we receive more information, including the traffic study time frame and completion, we will look to schedule a City Commission workshop, likely in November," Spoor said.

Related Coverage

Commission Concerns Could Derail Firmenich Deal

Community Reacts to Firmenich Property Decision

Community Members Voice Opinions on Firmenich Property Proposal

Commissioners Split on Firmenich Property Proposal

What's Your Opinion on the Firmenich Property Proposal?

What do you think about this latest development with this story? Let us know in the comments below.

Related Topics: Business, Development, Firmenich Property, Firmenich Property Proposal, Mayor Andy Steingold, and Richman Group of Florida

Robert "Bobby" Saltzman

7:01 am on Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Without a viable entrance and exit on to McMullen Booth Rd I still don't see how the added congestion will or can be explained away. I'm really interested to know how they plan to dump 300 plus cars between 7 and 8am onto a single lane road and call it feasible...it’s a hot button issue no matter how you slice it.

Reply

Sheryl Hollen

11:08 am on Thursday, October 18, 2012

We really have to be concerned, specifically at this time...because if they do a traffic survey with Main Street and Philipee traffic patterns being diverted because of construction, they will not get the correct and/or normal feedback.

Reply

Harborite

1:40 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

I have another concern about this traffic study. It appears that the developer is either conducting this traffic study themselves or they are choosing a company who they will be paying to conduct this study. How unbiased will the results be if the study is being paid for by the developer? I am always concerned about bias in studies due to financial interests. The City should really conduct this traffic study themselves or pay their own contractor to do it.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Jeffrey Rosenfield

3:20 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Joe, I have been told by the city that they are requesting proposals from two firms that they have on retainer, and neither one is affiliated with the applicant.

Betty Lou Douglas

8:17 pm on Saturday, October 20, 2012

The traffic concerns go beyond McMullen Booth Road. Many people will turn left on 590 and go to 7th St S. to head for Bayshore and SR 60. Adding more traffic through that neighborhood is not in the best interest of the folk who live there and for the town Safety Harbor. My family moved here in 1950 and there have been a lot of changes in 60+ years, but there is much about Safety Harbor that hasn't changed - the Main St. "business" district is still 10 blocks long, there are no traffic lights, and people still care deeply about this lovely little town. To my mind, little is a good word.

Reply

Leave a comment