Commissioners Split On Firmenich Property Proposal
A developer wants to build a 296-unit residential complex and 37,900 square feet of retail and office space on the 34-acre property off McMullen Booth Road.
A number of issues received attention during the City Commission meeting Monday night, including a proposal to allow a church to open in the Oakbrook Plaza and how to proceed with damage repairs from Tropical Storm Debby.
But the agenda item that drew the most discussion was the one regarding the status of the development agreement for the old Firmenich Citrus Center property on the northeast corner of McMullen Booth Road and SR 590.
The Richman Group of Florida, part of a company that bills itself as "one of the nation's ten largest residential property owners", wants to build a residential and commercial development on the 34-acre property, which would include a 296-unit apartment complex and up to 37,900 square feet of retail/office/service properties.
The issue, which has been been in the planning stages pending studies and approval from the commission to proceed, touched off a mini-debate among the commissioners as to the viability and practicality of having such a large development in town.
"I have a serious issue with allowing further sprawl of commercial development," Mayor Andy Steingold said. "How far north are we going to allow this commercial node to creep?"
"Nothing against the project itself," he added. "It's far away from the outskirts of Safety Harbor."
But Commissioner Nancy Besore, who lives near the area, was adamant that a development of this size would take away from the character and charm of her city.
"I live right by that property, and I'm not going to be able to sell that to the community. I can't sell it to myself," she said of the proposal, which calls for four-story apartment buildings not to exceed 15 units per acre or 55 feet in height.
"I don't mean to be offensive ... but this is not my Safety Harbor," she stated. "This is New York to me."
Vice Mayor Joseph Ayoub, however, wholeheartedly supported the proposal.
"I think this is a great opportunity for the city of Safety Harbor," he said.
"I'd like to see it a little more compacted ... but I think it's a great opportunity to bring 296 families to Safety Harbor who are going to be shopping on Main Street."
A representative for the Richman Group said the developer is willing to work with the city to meet the demands and restrictions such a complex would require, including tree canopy protection, wetlands preservation and stormwater management.
Studies will also be conducted regarding traffic in the area, an issue Commissioner Cilff Merz expressed concern over.
"My initial concern was traffic congestion," he said. "That intersection is already as built-out as it can be. I see a lot of congestion being added."
In the end the commission voted to go forward with the proposal, pending further studies, by a vote of 4-1, with Besore voicing the sole nay vote.
"I see a mess and I see sadness," she said. "To the developer I say go low. Go intimate. Go Safety Harbor. I beg you."
Pete T
12:58 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
With the right restrictions (building height, environmental protections, etc), this will be a great addition to our city. I support it.
Barbara W Hugg
7:46 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Would you like to live right next to a complex like this?
Georgia Leblanc
10:16 pm on Friday, October 5, 2012
Agree with you. We need our sleepy 19th century town to wake up to the 21st century. More restaurants open late, more people walking on main street more business and prosperity!! Except for the 3rd Friday events our main street look like a ghost town.
Dan Pressler
11:19 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Pete there is no way nearly 300 apartments & over 35,000 Sq Ft of retail in one complex can be an asset except in a purley monetary sense. Contrary to Ms. LeBlanc's comment below I like the laid back pace of the community (I often describe the town as a modern Mayberry) and adding that much development will irrevocably change that part of town. To properly handle the probable amout of traffic likely to be generated by the proposed complex 590 from McMullen-Booth to east of the site will need to be be widened - probably at city/tax-payer expense - which will negatively impact most of the businesses facing 590 where the widening is needed.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
5:47 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Thanks for the input, Pete.
K
11:35 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Here's an interesting website I found: http://www.ocgp.org/learn/sustainability/
Terrie Dahl Thomas
9:24 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
I completely disagree. Apartments never end up as an asset to a community after 10 years. They are not maintained like condos/homes. They are owned by companies that want maximize return on investment, and not committed to long term upkeep as individual property owners are. Just go visit apartment complexes in the area that are 10 to 20 years old for validation......
Barbara W Hugg
7:43 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Concur Terrie, 100%...
Barbara W Hugg
9:24 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
We live right around the corner from Firmenich on 590, and I am shocked, appalled and disappointed this was approved by our council. This will create a traffic nightmare in an area that can not support that much additional traffic. We've already allowed another set of condos/apartments to be built up on Main/McMullen.
The current infrastructure will not be able to handle the influx of people and their vehicles. I am certain there are other ways to bring in more shoppers for our retail, but using that as a validation for this construction is ludicrous. I certainly do not want to be living near it. I agree with Commissioner Besore, lets keep our community quaint and not let multi-unit buildings ruin our small town flavor. Remember, this is the town that doesn't even want a stop light...
Jeffrey Rosenfield
9:55 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Terrie and barbara, thanks for the comments. But just to clarify, the actual development has not been approved yet, just the decision to go forward with further studies (tree canopy, wetlands protection, traffic, etc...) to see if the project is a viable option for the city.
Jimmy p
8:54 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
I would like to see the companies and study their history that will be hired for the evaluation of the tree canopy, wetlands and traffic protection. This should be made public and their reputation and payments be made an open book by the city.
Harborite
9:55 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Although this 296-unit residential complex with 37,900 square feet of retail/office/service properties will be on the edge of the City and will probably not ruin Safety Harbor's small town image, I worry about the future. I hope that the approval of this project is not a signal to future developers that Safety Harbor is open to more of these types of large scale developments. Developers all over Florida have ruined other cities and towns that once had the same attractive small town atmosphere that Safety Harbor still has. We must be vigilant and not ruin Safety Harbor with overdevelopment because once we lose our special small town Old Florida charm, we can't ever get it back.
Jimmy p
8:52 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Amen. Look at the town itself...most of the apartment complexes already take away its charm visually. getting rid of any land and nature always hurts everyone in the surroundings. We need more parks...how about the tow raising taxes for a year and buying the property ? I wonder how that would be taken. I for one would pay into that.
K
11:04 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
I like your idea of the small town image and parks. One think I did notice that there are no places to swim in our area. What about a beautiful conservation area with a lazy river or small water park/arcade or even a pool with swimming lessons- any of which have posted open and close hours and possible job opportunity. Both the City of Dunedin and Oldsmar have spraygrounds. Cypress Forest Park in Oldsmar is adjacent to a wildlife and environmental preserve and features picnic shelters, restrooms, a boardwalk and paths through wooded nature areas. This may offer and opportunity for concessions, arts and craft vendors as well.
Terrie Dahl Thomas
11:39 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
This apartment complex WILL happen with a commission that allows it to happen. 4 to 1 vote now. Joe Ayoub will soon be our mayor and he is in complete favor of this development. Also remember he was the only commissioner to vote against our Grand Tree Ordinance. If residents do not want projects like this in the community they have to send emails, go to meetings, write letters to the editor and support commissioners who share the same vision of our beloved town. Commissioners have the potential to do great damage to the character of Safety Harbor. Once something has been altered it is gone forever.
I know if I lived nearby I would be very upset. Perhaps TAXPAYERS can organize to prevent this from happening.
We also need to remember with more concrete comes more runoff and pollutants . Briar Creek should be remembered when projects of this scale come before a commission that had been tasked with fixing the mistakes of commissions past.
Everyone needs to get to know the 3 people that are running for commission ( they are running for one open seat) their voice will be important for this project down the road. I like Ray Irvin, passed my questioning with flying colors :)
Jimmy p
8:50 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Sounds like JOE AYOUB should be looked at long and hard and to study his alliances. It shounds like he could care less about this town. I see this kind of disreguard for the natural suprroundings and it is all just so upsetting that the people do not speak up to make a difference.
K
2:45 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Joe Ayoub supported the beautification efforts to green the Philippe Parkway years ago which is wonderful; he is a man who perseveres through the hurt he must endure regarding Stephen Ayoub that the Times did a story about on March 25th of 2010. His endurance is to be commendable.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
6:17 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Look for profiles on the other two candidates soon, Terrie!
Ray R Irvin
11:00 pm on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
I took time today to look at this project today, and have several concerns. I believe the impact on traffic on SR-590 and the connecting through-fairs will have an negative factor to the community at-large. Future project must be required to do an impact study on traffic, environments, storm water, emergency services, commercial and residential quality of life issues,not just the boundaries of the development it's self. When the project is done the developer will move on and we the tax payers will have to live with the results. Future problems will fall to the tax payers to pay for and the residence to live with. That should never be aloud to happen, planning will not fix everything but it will lower the risk to the citizens who will pay for the failures. So to look at every project from every point of view to insure we allow development that fits the kind of city we all came together to live in as neighbors, it's our decision and joint futures not the developers.
jarine
8:54 am on Thursday, October 4, 2012
What is the alternative? Does the city have a master plan to encourage the kind of development they would like to see happen with this type of property? Without a master plan, commercial developers will build what they see is most profitable without regard for the ambiance we want to encourage in our City. The Commissioners will vote for whomever is giving them the most visibility.
K
11:23 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
http://www.ocgp.org/learn/sustainability/
Jimmy p
8:47 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
This sounds like a disaster in the making. Apartments always bring down the value of an area...each and every time.Anyone that doest think that has no grasp of reality. If anything, homes should be built or the city should uy the land and leave it natural. We are losing the look and feel of a florida town daily...look at that mess of houses they are putting at the top of main street. Ugly apartments, and all losing the small town feel. The city wants more money...and it is all about money. You want groth? fix up main street...And the adition of more commercial developers? look to the north and south of us...there are whole rows of open and empty businesses everywhere, add them together ! Even worse, take a walk down mainstreet and count the empty businesses...I think the Vice Mayor should be looked at closely on this...even to the point we should look where he is living and then what the plans are...I gaurentee he is not living near apartments, but in a single unattached home with a yard and a garage.
It is so obvious this is a money play on so many levels and anyone in the safety harbor government supporting this kind of development should be looked at closley and questioned if they really care for the town itself.
It all smells of greed.
Jimmy p
8:48 am on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Please let us know when we can make our voices heard to shoot down this disaster.
Jeffrey Rosenfield
10:43 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Jimmy, I appreciate all your comments. We will definitely post updates regarding future meetings that will focus on this issue. Keep reading Safety Harbor Patch!
Brian Blood
9:27 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Jimmy P and all Safety Harbor residents concerned with preserving the way of life that has drawn us to this unique community. Please attend the Planning and Zoning Board meeting this Wednesday October 10th, 2012 at 6:30 PM at the Safety Harbor City Hall. There will an vote taken on the Richman Group Proposal AKA “Dark Shadow”. Please come prepared to voice your informed opposition to this proposal. The Planning and Zoning Board wants to hear facts, not opinions. You can find all information regarding this meeting and the propsal on the city's web site. Click on the “Meeting Agendas and Minutes” category and then click on the PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING AGENDA for Oct 10th. This is "our" city we have a voice and it must be heard !
Jeffrey Rosenfield
9:29 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Thank you for the information, Brian. Here is the link you mentioned:
http://safetyharbor.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?view_id=6&event_id=10
K
11:10 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Does anyone know more about the Richman Group? Are there any outstanding complaints or legal issues. It appears they are one of the top 10 in the Nations Leading Housing organizations, development, affordable housing, investment banking, construction property management. I think there have been a few references to them in court? Not sure.
Dee Dokumaci
10:45 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I will sign the petition, I am a business owner of 5 months in our quaint community however I am not a resident but still that should not be an issue, I moved my business from Downtown Dunedin due to being overcrowded with unfinished condos which was an eye sore to say the least plus too many restaurants & bars which brought in the wrong element at the moment small businesses in Downtown Dunedin are hurting where attention is given to excessive bars, a lot of families have distanced themselves, I am thankful the families who used to shop at my boutique are now back to shop at my boutique here due to Safety Harbor being so unique & quaint!
Also here's another point, take a good look at Downtown Clearwater, that massive condo with retail shops below is sitting empty, same thing is happening in condos galore in overcrowded beaches with massive traffic problems!
Ideal development would be to build 2 story family townhomes which could be used for seasonal rentals to build tourism, there are so many travelers who want to lease a townhome 4 to 5 months some even for 6 months during season, it might even give them an excuse to visit during slow season, they want to be able to bring their pets with them so it is nice to have a doggy park, other amenities included would be a library, small drugstore, a surf & turf type market, a bank, a community activity room, possibilities are endless & it is good for the adjacent community, please consider this option, thanks :)
K
11:15 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
During the last couple of years I have noticed the traffic increase in Safety Harbor especially on Main street, Baystore and Philippe Parkway. It's really too bad it has picked up so much. It's a little more difficult to ride bikes and cross the street with family, a dog, etc. I thought Safety Harbor was a sweet family clean place to live and visit. I enjoyed the ceremonies at the marina on many occasions. One item the main street is missing is an arcade. You might be surprised at how many families this would draw in; how about a kite and or bike shop? Also; aren't there enough vacant rentals, homes, apartments? Do we need more? We should be focusing on the supply and demand which is already apparent. Also, there is no place to swim and re-create in this town. We vacation going to Busch gardens and Daytona Lagoon (out of the area).
Fritz Kirsch
10:06 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
After a few years go by will the developer sell off to someone else who will allow Section 8 housing? This isn't the kind of neighborhood I'd like to see come to Safety Harbor. Rentals don't bring in the same clientele as permanent fixed residents. This company is out to maximize their property development with no thought to how it will fare within the community. 296 units with only one and half parking spaces per unit with no guest parking is unrealistic. Traffic onto two lane Highway 590 is going to over run the road and the adjacent intersection. Does this seem like realistic planning or just another company out to make a buck? I'm opposed to this development and hope you will. At four stories tall do we really want a sundial on the surrounding neighborhood. No, no no.